As of: Click here to add this website to your favorites
  rss
Bar News Search >>>

An engineer who worked at Moffett Field pleaded guilty Wednesday to possessing child pornography on a government computer, U.S. Attorney Joseph Russoniello's office said Thursday.

Christopher Wiltsee, 57, entered the plea Wednesday in U.S. District Judge Jeremy Fogel's courtroom in San Jose.

Wiltsee, a Morgan Hill resident, no longer works for the federal government. In his plea, the engineer who worked at NASA Ames Research Center admitted to downloading child pornography and possessing more than 600 images, some of which were sadistic and masochistic in nature, U.S. Department of Justice spokeswoman Orisme Carminati confirmed in an e-mail. Wiltsee remains in federal custody.

NASA Ames spokesman Michael Mewhinney said he knew Wiltsee, but isn't sure how long he worked at Moffett Field.
"It's too bad," Mewhinney said. "I don't understand it."

Wiltsee's child pornography images were discovered on the government computer in June 2005 and he was indicted Sept. 26, 2007, prosecutors said. Mewhinney offered no further comment and referred calls to the Department of Justice.

Carminati declined to provide any details about the investigation by NASA's Office of the Inspector General. Wiltsee is scheduled to again appear in court on June 4 for sentencing. The maximum penalty for possession of child pornography is 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine.

Breaking Legal News  |  Headline News  |  Law Center  |  Legal Business  |  Court News  |  Law Firm News  |  Legal Interviews
Political and Legal  |  Practice Focuses  |  Legal Spotlight  |  Events & Seminars  |  Legal Marketing  |  Court Watch  |  Immigration
Press Releases  |  International  |  Politics  |  Justice Stories  |  Attorney Web Design  |  Celebrity Courthouse  |  Law Firm Marketing
© 2008 The Legal News Journal. All Rights Reserved.

The content contained on the site has been prepared by TLN Journal as a service to the internet community and is not intended
to constitute legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance.